We have the bells going, so I need to ask the next question.
In here, there is protection provided for the title of the profession, but not an acronym for the profession.
From my experience, the accounting profession is a good example. In their colleges, their regulations, law, their statutes, typically they will protect the word “accountant” and variations of the word “accountant”. As well, they'll protect CPA, CA, CMA, and all the old varieties of accountants.
If this bill passes the way it is right now, because there is no acronym in here, to the best of my knowledge, you will have people who will want to pretend to be trademark agents and will simply use an acronym. I don't know if that's ever been noticed by members of the institute.
It goes back to the question of whether you have current members who perhaps engage in the provision of services that they're not supposed to provide or are not qualified for. Are there people out there pretending to be trademark agents?