You're saying that the legislative drafter got it wrong, but you are aware, of course, that prescription cannabis is subject to excise tax if it doesn't have a DIN. That was the conclusion of our last round of discussions around the BIA. At the same time, we had witnesses on this round of the BIA, including Canadians for Fair Access to Medical Marijuana, who raised that issue as well.
If you're saying that the legislative drafter got it wrong, I'm inclined to then ask how you would word this so that the 250,000 people who take medical marijuana and who don't take the products that are the minority—those that are actually covered by the drug identification number—can actually have their excise tax removed. How would you word that?