I'll reiterate that the strong recommendation of the labour partners who came to this testimony was that they wanted to see that responsibility set right up front in the purpose clause. It is the strong recommendation of the 2004 pay equity task force that the responsibilities of everybody come right up front so that there's no question about interpretation when inevitably this does end up back in court.
An echoing of some of the responsibilities laid out in the detailed parts of the legislation is important, but the request was that this come right up in the purpose clause. That's always the interpretation through which any future judge would view the legislation, whether it had been adhered to or not.