Thank you for your presentation. For some of us it's fascinating stuff.
I'll start with you, Patrick, with regard to one of your comments. Canada has decided to adopt some of the articles and provisions and hold back on others, which I would frame as a prudent approach. As we adopt them, they become permanent; we have no choice. We're in the game, if you will, by taking them. In your comments about some of the guidance, that you feel more guidance is required in some of the areas of those provisions and articles, I think it's really important to hear from folks like you. I'm very familiar with Osler's work and with how they are one of the foremost firms dealing with these disputes.
Perhaps you could tell us a little bit about one of the mechanisms that you think might be helpful, as each of these articles or provisions is looked at, in terms of whether or not it is in Canada's best interest to adopt them, and about what process you think might be useful for you and Toby and others to provide advice and counsel on that.