I appreciate that.
Basically, we have a step in the right direction. It's something that is addressing a number of issues, but it's not a panacea and, by definition, it can't be. It's not a magic wand.
Mr. Sanger, what do you think on that? Is it possible to have...? I know you have a number of issues with this particular agreement, but I think it's reasonable to say, as we just heard from Mr. Marley, that you can't capture tax avoidance problems—call it base erosion and profit shifting if you want to get technical—in one agreement. We can't deal with that challenge in one agreement.