Within the general world, and within the Financial Action Task Force discussions, it's generally 25%. That's the number that's tossed around, although there are variances. I think that's seen as an appropriate balance between the burden placed upon reporting entities and individuals who fail to report versus the ability to control a company. The ability to get collusion among five, six, eight or 10 individuals is much less of a risk than when you only have to get two or three or four people joined. That said, I think there will be further discussion on that number. A lot of discussion is going on internationally and with our colleagues in other countries on what thresholds are appropriate as the threats and the risks begin to grow.
