They are threefold.
One, there is a certain number of preventative measures. I know you're speaking about what happens in an insolvency. If the situation is what it is right now, then the change that most affects that would be the change related to first issuance orders and duties of good faith insofar as that will allow for retirees and pensioners to be participants in the process at an earlier stage. Essentially, the first issuance order change ensures that only those essential orders are done at first. On those unfunded pension liabilities, those pensioners would be unsecured creditors to the bankruptcy and insolvency either under CCAA or BIA. This will allow them to be more aptly represented in that process as the restructuring and the negotiation of the insolvency continues.
Two, the duties of good faith are also important in that this will actually ensure that those obligations are now being placed on everyone who is party to the insolvency and that there are best interests being maintained.
Three, the economic proceedings are also important, particularly on the restructuring side. If it's a pure insolvency and it's a liquidation, that's another matter. If it's actually proceeding to insolvency under the possibility of a restructuring, that capacity to be able to know exactly who you're at the table with and to have full understanding of the other economic actors that are party to the restructuring is another zone.
The vast majority of these changes, though, are focused on the preventative side and aimed at trying to prevent the situation.