Thank you for the question.
Your question has two important points.
First, the definition of control rating has two aspects. The first aspect is the percentage of shares that a person holds and that give the person control, which is 25%. The bill also includes a definition of a person who controls a company with less than 25%.
We think we've captured that because we have both aspects. There's also an important linkage to other aspects of our total approach to money laundering, terrorist financing and proceeds of crime, in that enterprises already, under FINTRAC regulations, when they utilize a Canadian financial institution, are required to deposit with their financial institution any beneficial ownership information related to the exact-same percentage. We see this as boots and suspenders in that it also provides ease for the corporation in that the same requirements they're subject to for banking purposes are the same requirements they're subject to for corporations. We think that parallel actually builds a strong system.