So, we have a letter whose authenticity is not acknowledged, but it's admitted that 15 people signed it. It's not an amnesty, because that word is being rejected. On the other hand, Mr. Treusch, who was in this room, referred to a settlement—a règlement. Let's look at the definition of the word “settlement.”
Merriam-Webster says, “a formal agreement or decision that ends an argument or dispute; also: an amount of money that someone receives as part of such an agreement”.
I'm trying to get to the substance of the problem and understand how the CRA operates in such cases.
A letter signed by another CRA official, namely, Stéphanie Henderson, has been made public. Based on what you've said, 15 people signed it. The terms were advantageous, because the penalties were largely cancelled. That is the letter we have before us.