Just quickly on that point, first, I think both the minister and the agency wouldn't characterize this as an amnesty. I think we've already pointed out that we can't confirm any specific agreement, but the document posted to the CBC website contains no immunity from criminal prosecution. It indicates that the agency would have gone back 16 tax years. Financial analysis would show you that the compound interest would add 25% to the bill. Any taxpayer signing such an agreement would have to waive their right to appeal or object. Commonly in these situations, the agency insists on payment within 60 days.
Secondly, in terms of the go-forward and the remarks the minister had, the agency, when it is litigating, remains open to settlement, based on the facts of the case. In future, if the agency is litigating with a taxpayer, based on the facts of the case, based on the criteria we've established, we may consider resolving the matter without waiting for the judgment from the judge.