That's a good question. It has to do with the timetable for implementation, in the sense that the extended benefits begin in January 2015.
The idea of it being a measure that tracks a sharp and sustained deterioration in labour markets and having that access to benefits begin in January of 2015 would become increasingly less connected to the proposed policy measure.
In terms of the flexibility that's built into the system—that was related to the chair's first question—the program remains able to adjust to ongoing changes in economic regions. When regions have a change over a period of almost a year and a half, versus the change in commodity prices, it constitutes less of a sudden increase in unemployment and moves away from the policy intent of dealing with those mass layoffs that occurred at a given time.
Those two measures—the policy design as well as the idea that we are trying to bring extraordinary measures that target a sharp and sudden deterioration—both speak to timing that gets less direct the further you get away from the period of the downturn.