We don't want anyone to take away the idea that we think P3s aren't a useful way to build infrastructure. It's just not necessarily useful in every single situation. We do recognize that it's something that slows down the process of moving forward on infrastructure projects.
To your question, which is around the speed of getting to infrastructure projects, I think I can identify a couple of issues, because we do want to get to things quickly.
In the case of the research and university projects, we had a short timeline because we knew that many of those projects were ready and willing to go. I believe the timelines have already passed for the submissions to be submitted to the infrastructure department, so we're getting going quickly on those.
In the federal infrastructure that we outlined, we also knew there were many projects ready and able to go, so those things can get going rapidly. By a change in the sharing of infrastructure projects from one-third federal, one-third provincial, and one-third municipal, to fifty-fifty, we actually create the conditions that allow projects to go forward more rapidly.
Those things, together with not requiring a P3 screen in every situation, will allow us to move forward more rapidly, and we hope to get things started that will have a long-term impact on the economy while providing some short-term gains in terms of immediate employment.