Okay, fine. I simply wanted to get that clear.
My question is from a constituent of mine, who is a former pension plan manager, who writes to me and says, “This government talks a lot about making decisions based on evidence and scientific data, yet the finance minister, before being elected, authored a book called The Real Retirement, which contained a compelling analysis of the adequacy and stability of the Canadian pension system and advocated for the retirement age increase from 65 to 67. If you ever get the opportunity to ask the finance minister why he is now doing something different than he advocated for before being elected—”
What should I tell him?