I think, as you know, this would impose an additional charge on the public treasury, and therefore I have to rule it inadmissible.
I will read, because we're in a new meeting, the relevant section of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, second edition, where it states on pages 767 and 768:
Since an amendment may not infringe upon the financial initiative of the Crown, it is inadmissible if it imposes a charge on the public treasury, or if it extends the objects or purposes or relaxes the conditions and qualifications specified in the royal recommendation.
This amendment would increase the number of eligible claimants, which would impose an additional charge on the public treasury, and therefore I would rule it inadmissible.
On amendment BQ-7.