I think our preference would be for a long-term infrastructure plan to try and eliminate the peaks and valleys in the construction industry. This is what we've been arguing for.
The reason we are hoping that the money will find its way out in 2016 is that there are some areas of the country that could really use the additional stimulus. I think the minister is looking at those areas and that the approach is going to be a reasonable one, from all the signs that we've received so far.
We believe that the country needs investments in infrastructure. One of the things that we recently did with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities was to take a look at the assets of municipalities across the country. What we found is that there's a significant amount of underinvestment going on, in part because municipalities just don't have the funding.
Our hope would be that, certainly in the short term, we could see some of that money going to help municipalities address deferred maintenance, because we think that's also a priority. That would be my response.