First, as a positive, I think the IFIT program has been extremely successful. It has stimulated significant regional development. Where we lack a lot on the innovation side is the incentives for biofuels, biomass usage, and other products, where there are incentives to bring the fibre from the bush and then have it processed—harvest residuals, the tops and limbs of the trees that we leave in the forest. The Americans, in particular, have done a good job with that through their Agricultural Act.
The incentives for the fuels are really what's keeping us out of that realm. There is just no room, currently, the way the incentives go.
Sporadically, the Americans come out with what's called black liquor tax, which is a technical term. It was a way to give the Americans $9 billion of cash with direct infusion. We countered with a $1-billion tax credit program.
How do we compare? We are at the lower end, but I don't think we would or could justify trying to go up to that level. It is, at times, I'd say perverse at the federal and then at the state level. What we've asked for, we think, is reasonable. It doesn't put us on top of the pile, by any stretch, but it keeps us competitive.