That's a great question and it's a very simple answer. You put it into rail.
It makes absolutely no sense to me. I know we're going to have this argument of whether the carbon tax is beneficial or not, but just think of this for a second. We're shutting our rail lines down so we can move commodities by truck, which are 12 times less efficient, and nobody is squawking, nobody is saying anything. Everybody complains about the roads, but nobody wants to pay for them and nobody wants to fix them, so we have increased taxes for that. That money should go to ensure that grain—and I am speaking specifically for grain—is moved in the most efficient manner, and that's on railways.
My partner and I own an elevator. The railway track goes right past our elevator, no further than I am from Mr. Easter. The only way we're going to get that train to stop at our elevator so that we can load grain is if I lay in front of the track. It's going to go by otherwise.
The railways don't care. They're working with the grain companies to consolidate the system and to make the producers move their grain as far as possible, at the highest cost, creating the most emissions.
There are some problems with the carbon tax, but I understand the initiative, and I'm in favour of it. What I don't agree with is the fact that nobody is looking at the overall efficiency.
We can move grain a lot more efficiently on the rail than we can by truck, and nobody wants to tackle that elephant, but to tackle that elephant you also have to tackle the grain companies.
Our little elevator was closed down and we have to haul grain 100 miles. That elevator still works efficiently, just as well today as it did 15 years ago, and the railway still goes by it three times a week, but we can't load. Does that make any sense?