Okay, before I turn to you, while we're on Churchill, you also presented us with a second paper that wasn't read out, and I want to ask you a question on this.
In the requirements for a port to be port authority, there are two areas that the Port of Churchill doesn't meet. One is having diversified traffic and the other is being financially self-sufficient. You make this point in the paper. You said that one could make the point that these conditions are not currently met, but they could be met if the Government of Canada, Manitoba, and local stakeholders were committed to the port.
You also make the point, and it has been made here before, that it's the only Arctic deepwater port, and it could be the best port location for the Canadian Coast Guard and the Canadian Navy as the north opens up more.
How would you see that happening with those stakeholders, local, Manitoba, and Canada? How would you see them committing to the port, in what sense and in what way?