For the record, I'm not against lower taxes. Tax decreases are always a good thing. However, if I had a choice between adjusting the tax rate on the existing threshold or increasing the threshold, the economic impact of increasing the threshold will be so much greater, because, again, the key is to keep the money in the business. The money in the business will be used to continue to grow the business.
Once you take the money out of the business, which a lot of business owners like me are forced to do, it's no longer available to fund innovation and research, to buy equipment, or to hire new staff. That's why I want to focus on increasing the threshold, which hasn't been adjusted for probably a decade at the federal level, as far as I'm aware.
That would be my preference, but I wouldn't refuse a tax decrease if one was offered.
Could you remind me of the second part of your question, please?