Welcome, everyone.
For the last couple of days we've heard a lot of colour on the issue of succession and intergenerational transfer of assets on farms. It seems to be, obviously, a sticking point, and something which, on first glance, in my humble opinion, needs to be addressed. Perhaps somebody could provide the devil's advocate's view on the other side. Why are the rules the way they are right now? Is there any reason they should be that way? I'm obviously going to take a look at Bill C-274, Mr. Caron's bill. I'm very curious. Tax policy is very important. It's part of innovation. It's part of making sure our economy runs smoothly.
I would like to hear from Mr. Lemieux, and any of you on the issue of why the rules may be the way they are, please. This is more for my benefit.