We'll have to end there, Raj. We're already substantially over the time when we were supposed to adjourn.
I have just two other questions, or I guess a comment, Mr. Leblanc.
The Champlain Bridge didn't come up, but just so you know, we have supported that the federal government pay for that bridge. Ever since a senator started advocating to drop the tolls on the Confederation Bridge, the biggest complaint I get in my riding is why the federal government is paying for the Champlain Bridge when we in P.E.I. have to pay a $46 toll to get to New Brunswick. That's a good thing for you. I get a few complaints. I'll stand by the contract that we signed on the Confederation Bridge, just so you know. I figured I had better point that out.
Mr. Lemieux, I'd like to go back to the AgriStability program for a minute. I understand from what you said that the Quebec government has picked up some of that sleeve between 70% and 85% where the threshold was in terms of support. The provincial government picks it up when incomes fall below that threshold. On the federal-provincial agreement, I do know that the difficulty is that if the sleeve that provincial government works within has to cover some of the cost of AgriStability, then it can do less with the monies for whatever other things it might do.
Would you like to comment on that a little further? I'd like to know where the Quebec government is on that.