I agree that we need to have some clarity. The time frame that has been put out I think does make sense. I don't necessarily know if they will be successful in achieving it, but at the same time, as a firm, we have been out there saying that, given the slow growth backdrop, countries that have the room to provide stimulus should.
I think that if we're going to bring in a long-term commitment to when we will return to balance, it should be within the context that we are going to do what's necessary to get the Canadian economy off the mat and provide our commitment. We've started that. I think we should be prepared to provide more.
But it's more than just, say, the federal government and the fiscal program it brings in; it's also what sectors it is going to crowd and how it's going to do it. I think it's more credible if you bring out a program that can credibly crowd in other sectors of the economy, and right now I think it's business investment by drawing in foreign direct investment, because we're not going to be able to provide it domestically with the challenges of the non-financial sector.
As I say, we can't necessarily overlook.... By remaining focused—I'm saying credible for a long-term fiscal commitment—we can't overlook the need to provide stimulus in the short term as the Canadian economy goes through some I think pretty challenging adjustments.