Again, I think the win-win, if you will, is being able to identify and structure these projects—which we are 100% convinced are there because of this $500-billion gap—so that we get more of what we call “bankable” projects. That probably doesn't sound very good politically, but that's what we call them. We say it's a bankable project and people would put money into it.
If it's a Canadian pension fund, that's a win-win, because it's Canadians who are benefiting from that. It's perfectly circled. They're actually ideal. Again, going back to the diversification side, yes, they are going overseas, and that's good, but there's so much more from an asset class requirement to be an infrastructure need that I think it would be a very big benefit. I'll shut up there. I'm talking too long.