I don't think so, sir. I think our hope is that this will allow even more money, if you will, to be put into the system. We do think that federal money is needed—in fact, they call it non-profit generating areas—in low-income housing areas. There's a very big infrastructure deficit with first nations, somewhere in the order of $25 billion to $40 billion. We think this $40 billion is going to attract a lot more money overseas to do more projects, which will therefore enable people to also have money to do these other projects. In other words, we think we're going to be increasing the size of the pie.
Another part—and I know this is a bit of controversy but I'll just put it on the table—is the asset-recycling notion. The view is that once we put money into a project—it may be a government project, a greenfield project—it then, over time, is sold to private investors outside, and that money is then used for other purposes. Again, I want to say I have no idea what the government's doing on this with airports and things like that, but this is the notion of creating an approach whereby we're investing, building a project, which then, if it's completely government-owned, is sold and that money is released for investment in other areas.
We think that following this approach will mean that the pie will be much bigger and we will actually be able to do more of these.