Yes, if I may, I'd just put a final point on that. I think it's an excellent question, and it does give us an opportunity to make a clear distinction between passive investing and active investing. We'll get back to you on the facts on this particular holding. We have exposures to over 2,000 public companies around the world, so we'll look at this one.
In the active management dimension, it's been commented—we've taken note—that maybe the CPP could be broadly invested in an exchange traded fund, which would be purely passive. If you look at the active management, you see that what it does is give an organization, an institutional investor that is willing to be patient, productive, and highly engaged, a look at those specific practices to understand how management behaves.
We take a very strong view that management that takes on social and governance responsibilities and engages with their local community is a really good proxy for excellent management. Most importantly for us, because of our exceptionally long holding periods—particularly on active and the decisions we make, we will hold that active for a very long time—we can have influence in working with management and the board. That's because we have a strong conviction that those organizations that pay particular attention to those facts will build much more value than a comparable organization that does not.