I think the reports are already excellent. You're talking about this report. I think we regularly improve it, just like we improve our macroeconomic model. Like anything else, we can improve it over time.
What else would we need? As I was saying, we've been receiving a number of very interesting requests that we can't necessarily respond to. Are we making the most of our model, for example? Maybe we are, given our capacities.
Remember we have an analysis capacity of about 15 person-years, which isn't much to produce over 30 reports a year. We've rarely said no to projects, but some have been delayed over the long term. Also, not only do we need to develop a methodology for these projects, we also need a great deal of information and economic data, which sometimes takes time to collect. For example, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health is conducting an extremely thorough analysis to develop a national pharmacare program. Two person-years are dedicated full-time to this analysis. The work will take a few months. We'll likely be able to share our results in the fall.
So, we don't always have the capacity, because we lack some resources. Regarding the level of accuracy of this type of report, I think we've been improving it over time.