There is also the not yet existing joint committee. Keep in mind that the legislation refers continually to that joint committee.
Finally, the other accounting is that we have to provide an annual report, as other agents of Parliament do, to the two Speakers at the end of the fiscal year. This is the other accountability that will be in place, too, so all parliamentarians can look at the PBO's work and see how it operated last year, and so on.
One thing that is really interesting is Mr. Liepert's question on whether this officer of Parliament, the PBO, will become—will, maybe, would—an independent agent of Parliament under the Parliament of Canada Act. The PBO would not have its own legislation like the OAG, the Information Commissioner, and so on. It would be similar to what you have on the House of Commons side, which is the Ethics Commissioner, who is also under the Parliament of Canada Act. The relationship is always with Parliament. It's under the Parliament of Canada Act, and then, on behalf of parliamentarians, through the reports. We do serve other stakeholders—the public and so on—but this is a distinction that is very important to make compared with other officers of Parliament.