Sorry, I have a supplemental question.
All right. That was a fair point. It wasn't really a question to try to trap the witnesses.
Given this experience and that it's unusual for the House leader to indicate an openness to amendments on a budget implementation act, do you feel that, institutionally, the Privy Council Office, as a central agency, will make greater efforts in the future when drafting legislation that would eventually work its way for recommendation by the Prime Minister or the finance minister to take greater care not only to respect the political wishes of the government, but also to make sure they're doing even more due diligence than they already do, in having informal or formal consultations before the legislation is proposed?