I'm happy to go first.
The rationale that we would offer for the bank, and why we think we need it, is that it can be a vehicle that will bring projects to market that would not normally come to market.
By that, I mean that they may be projects—Matti referred earlier to a couple of them—that have a risk attached to them that wouldn't normally attract the private sector. The bank, through the various vehicles it will have available to it, could in fact de-risk that project to the degree where it becomes attractive to the international investment community. That will result, first and foremost, in more projects coming out because of the bank, but it will also free up the government's funds for them to invest in other projects.
From our perspective, it's a win-win.