That's a very good question. There's a lot of public money in this, $35 billion to start, from the federal government. I think there should be some representative of the public interest on this, not necessarily a politician but a public official at a high level, if there's that money. I mean, that's just to start. We have to accept the fact that all of these projects will ultimately be paid for by the public, either through governments or through user fees. There should be some public representation.
Now, people get concerned about political interference and about various politicians. You're all elected, so there is a democratic angle on that. We shouldn't be critical of politicians in that way. But I think you need to also look at the way in which you can remove some of these projects from the inappropriate political...such as creating the gazebo in Muskoka for the G7, that type of thing. The U.S. has quite a good system in place that reduces that earmarking.
You need comprehensive planning in place that is based on evidence and that has criteria for prioritizing projects. It's connected to what Mr. Ali Khan was talking about with regard to having that governance.