I'll try to be as quick as I can, Mr. Chair.
On the line of questioning before we broke, I guess the real concern being expressed is that this initiative really needs more study and it should be carved out of the budget implementation act. I'll just leave that. You may not be in a position to make any further comment on that.
I want to ask one final question. Yesterday, testimony from people who I guess had done some significant research on this idea described the difference between a P3 project as we know it today and what they saw this bank having the potential to do. The difference—these are my words, not theirs—is that these projects would be larger and riskier, but also potentially more rewarding. In other words, they would be a larger gamble than a typical P3 project might be. Would you agree with that?