We're very aware of the rebar situation. I think you're referring to the public interest inquiry that was put forward by the Government of British Columbia and the construction association there.
We would say that the purpose of trade remedies is to remove the distortions caused by unfair trade in the Canadian market. At the end of the day, the way that the CITT finally ruled on that public interest inquiry was that the trade remedy brings back true market competition. When one says that the price is lower with dumped steel, that is not an argument to be made, that that is the right thing to do. Otherwise, we wouldn't be living in a lawful society here in Canada.
When they made the decision to not reduce the duties on imports from the Asian countries into B.C., it was predicated on that fundamental lawful belief of what competitive markets should be in Canada. My understanding is contrary to yours of what happened with steel in Canada. After those duties were in place, there was actually more steel that came from Canadian steel producers into B.C. than prior to the duties.