The biggest change we were after was with regard to, as you mentioned, the particular market situation. The companies outside of North America offshore are getting really smart at trying to circumvent anti-dumping duty orders. They will do things in order to have their costs and prices not reflect market realities, thereby reducing their dumping margins and hurting Canadian steel producers. This now gives Canadian government officials within CBSA the ability to tell them, “Hey, your prices and costs aren't actually market-based. There is something happening in your market that is distorting it. We're going to adjust for those factors to bring it up to a market-based price or cost, and therefore have the appropriate dumping margin.”
The second one is around scope rulings, involving an increase in transparency of the process. Let's say a producer here in Canada or someone from offshore wanted to know whether a product was within scope or not in scope of a ruling. Previously that would have been done without everybody knowing about it. Now it will be a transparent process. Companies can participate and determine whether the product is within or without scope, and provide arguments either way, which is similar to how it is done in other countries at this time.
Another big area is around anti-circumvention. There will be a formal process now where, if countries outside of Canada try to cheat the system through either mislabelling or transshipment of products, we are able to have a process that provides dumping duties on those products that try to cheat the Canadian system and the Canadian government and its people.