I'd like you to elaborate. I'm not asking you to say whether the policy choices are correct. First of all, P3 Canada has a specific skill set. The government, however, might have chosen to have an expanded focus to include elements that would encourage more investment, rather than to just get all three levels of government more attuned to private sector investment with P3s. With the proper guidance, legislative changes, and support, P3 Canada could offer many of the same attributes as the infrastructure bank. It was a policy choice, I'm sure, that the government made to go ahead with a completely different crown corporation. Theoretically, though, it would be possible if the government chose to do so. Is that correct?
On May 30th, 2017. See this statement in context.