Sure. Forgive me, I am not familiar with the specifics of the piece of media that you're reading, but in terms of the statistic, the 84%, it's not necessarily that they're not reported. Through the departmental performance reports, we actually have a number of fees that are reported. Our understanding is that 84% of the fees are not subject to the User Fees Act. With the passing of the User Fees Act, which was a private member's bill, subsequent Department of Justice interpretation came to the conclusion that unless a fee was amended or introduced after the introduction of the User Fees Act, it was not subject to the provisions of the User Fees Act.
One thing we are proposing with the service fees act that we think would be a significant improvement, with the definition we've worked on in conjunction with our Department of Justice colleagues, is that all fees that fall within the definition be subject to the new legislation. We would have full coverage, where all provisions of the act would apply.