Okay. Thank you for taking the opportunity.
I ask committee members to stay for a moment. We need to look at the themes for next week. I have a proposal.
To the panellists, thank you for coming forward, for taking the time and making good suggestions. We'll have to get a summary of evidence before too long, but if there is one thing we are seeing in these hearings, it's that there are certainly a lot of lessons that can be learned from a crisis such as this. We have to deal with the immediacy of the problem in terms of the income, the business, the rents, you name it, but there are policy changes that can be made going forward as well.
Thank you all for your presentations.
Turning to committee members, I'm told that we might have a problem next Thursday. We will definitely have two hours, but the whips might not allow us to have four. We'll see how that pans out, but what I suggest is that we decide now on four panels. We might end up with three.
The first one on Thursday would be the minister and officials. That's a necessity for the bi-weekly report on the pandemic crisis and where the government is at. That comes out of the House of Commons, its motion.
I would suggest that we have a second panel, just a general panel. All of us have people who have somehow been missed, so it would be a type of catch-up panel to bring them in.
For Friday, panel three, I would suggest for the first part of the panel, support for Canadians ineligible for the announced measures to date. That comes out of our regular session we had long ago.
I would suggest that the last one be a combination of the manufacturing and construction sectors. That's more looking out at where do we go from here, at some of the suggestions that come up on what we do after this is over.
That's what I'm suggesting. Is there any disagreement with that?
Are you okay, Peter? Okay.
James, is that good?