I think it's an important point to make, because I don't want there to be an inference that the charitable sector is not professionally or well managed. Whether it's reporting to government on an annual basis or having community volunteers on boards of directors, our standards of accountability are high. In fact, Imagine Canada operates a standards program whereby we accredit charities.
I think one of the benefits, though, of having the kind of delivery system we are proposing is that those organizations and funders know the community organizations best. It's basically impossible to have one metric to determine the worth of any organization—quite frankly, it has been frustrating for society to use costs of administration as the sole determinant of worth—but if you are empowering a community foundation to grant to organizations it already knows, it has a pretty good sense on these things. It's built into the mechanism.