I'll try to keep my response very concise.
I would say there are a couple of points on data.
Number one, it would be fantastic if we could get much better and more timely data, and disaggregated data, on how the programs that have been rolled out are working. That will allow us to actually do faster learning. There's that piece to it.
I would also say that there are two really important blind spots that we have in Canada, or at least spots that are not sufficiently covered in terms of our current data sources. One, I would say, is more frequent data on household assets and debts. I'm delighted that we now finally have a triennial survey on that, but perhaps more frequent data on that and longitudinal data, so that we can actually see how people move in and out of things like asset poverty and how debt evolves within a household over time.
The other blind spot I would say is “within year” income information. We have quite good administrative records that show us the transitions in and out of poverty and how inequality changes year over year, but I think that this crisis has told us that people's situations can change rapidly and within the year. To be able to “build back better”, I think that this really does have to mean coming to grips with the volatility that also can take place in people's incomes within the year as well.