I'll start. Annie, if you want to chip in, that would be great.
It's very much a focus of everything we do. We are actively involved, to build on Ms. May's question, in interties in transmission to the north. Anything that results in getting remote communities off diesel is a good thing, and we're actively exploring models for that.
We are looking at renewable projects where it makes sense to do so. In other words, if there's a funding model in the market where they can get private sector capital, they don't need us, but there are instances where some of the risks involved do need us because of the peculiarities of the market and so on. We have a funding project in the Pirate Harbour Wind Farm in Nova Scotia, where the main benefit of that project really is that it helps to balance the Nova Scotia grid and provide more reliable power to that entire province.
The lens goes beyond renewable projects. We're looking at storage projects, at battery and pumped storage, and at all types of projects across the country. In addition, even when we're looking at transit projects, we're always looking at the option of electrification. There's always a cost trade-off, obviously, and those are policy decisions that public sponsors will need to make, but we always put those options on the table for consideration and try to get some measure through external validation of GHG reductions value.
Everything has a value and everything has a cost, so we view it very much as our job to do the work and to put good and valid options on the table for all the levels of government with which we collaborate.