I'm asking about you.
Evidence of meeting #45 for Finance in the 43rd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was sir.
A video is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #45 for Finance in the 43rd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was sir.
A video is available from Parliament.
Founder, WE Charity
I understand, sir.
It has three board members, based on their 2019 filings, two of whom work for the organization.
For us, yes, we have the U.S. entities, and as part of our own Korn Ferry review, we're evaluating those entities. We need to look exactly at this very specific information you're being asked about, and we're doing so.
NDP
Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC
Yes. On the issue of the insurance policies that were signed in regard to this particular contract with ESDC, will you make those available to the committee? The liability issue, of course, is fundamental. We have heard testimony that the federal government was put at great risk by proceeding the way it chose to proceed, so of course having the information about insurance policies in place would be absolutely vital.
Will you share all of that information with the committee?
Founder, WE Charity
I have two points, sir.
Yes, we'll share it.
The only organization that was being asked to be put at risk was WE Charity, by ESDC, by asking us to take 40,000 young people and assume full liability.
NDP
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter
Peter, I think the individuals have said several times that it's not a shell organization.
Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC
It is the very definition of a shell foundation. There are no assets.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter
Okay. We have four questioners left, and we'll have to go to four-minute rounds.
We have Mr. Morantz, Mr. McLeod, Mr. Poilievre and Ms. Koutrakis.
Mr. Morantz.
Conservative
Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON
Paragraph 5.1 of the contribution agreement allows monies to be spent on salary from this contribution agreement.
Was there anything in the agreement that banned either of you from receiving that money?
Founder, WE Charity
Sir, we are not paid by WE Charity, and we have never been paid by WE Charity. This was established. The entity that pays us, sir, is ME to WE Social Enterprise, which is not a party to this contract.
Conservative
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter
Mr. Poilievre, you can quote that part of the agreement if you'd like, and we'll allow the Kielburgers to answer.
Conservative
Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON
ME to We Foundation is listed in 18.4 as a subcontractor to WE Foundation of Canada. It's right there. It's true, unlike what you've just suggested.
Founder, WE Charity
As per my statement, sir, ME to We Social Enterprise pays us. ME to WE Social Enterprise was established as distinct and separate from ME to We Foundation, sir. The WE Foundation administers—