It was having the opportunity to have a longer conversation with senior officials and senior staff around why it did come back the way that it did. As per one of your colleagues on the committee's question earlier, there had been different thoughts around what this might look like when it was first discussed, so we wanted to have a better understanding of that.
We also wanted to have an understanding that all the t's had been crossed and the i's had been dotted. As the clerk said, that's why we were asking questions around due diligence and making sure also that it was the right method to do this—that not only was it the right organization but entering into this contribution agreement was the right way to do it—and we were assured that it was.