Okay. I'll ask one final question.
Minister Qualtrough, who was before the committee just moments ago, indicated in no uncertain terms that she remained confident that a third party administrator for the program would be essential if it was going to do everything the program was asking of the service provider rather than, for example, going through the civil service. The Prime Minister gave testimony to the effect that there was a binary choice presented during that May 22 cabinet meeting, which you were present for, according to your testimony today, saying that this was a binary choice: We were either going to go forward with WE Charity administering the program or there would not be a service grant program this summer.
Do you have any reason to believe, based on the information you had at the time, that there was another option, that in fact the civil service could have delivered the program in the manner contemplated by the government?