Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Just jumping back to that, what I'm basically getting at here is what I perceive to be going on: The only objective is to try to bring forward something in such a quick fashion as to be able to grandstand with the information.
What we've been trying to do, and this is what I've been getting at, is to put forward some amendments to the motion to set out the parameters in which the information is delivered so that it can be done in a way that is very easy for people to digest, for members to digest and for the Canadian public to digest. That's the premise of the two motions I brought forward previously.
I bring forward another motion to you, Mr. Chair. Hopefully, the members would agree that this subamendment would be more in line with what they think is appropriate, because I think this one is equally as important.
It reads as follows: “That, further, the committee requests the complete package of documents provided to the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons by relevant deputy ministers or signatories of the transmittal letters, as well as final packages of documents that the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons approved for release; that both the document packages be provided to the committee no later than October 19, 2020; and that after the committee reviews the two different versions of the documents, the committee invite each of the relevant deputy ministers or signatories of the transmittal letters, as well as the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons, to give testimony regarding the redactions applied to the documents that were requested and granted in the motion adopted on July 7, 2020; and that until such time as the testimony is complete, debate on the motion and the amendment from Mr. Poilievre be suspended; and that the Chair be authorized to schedule these witnesses and convene a meeting to resume the debate on Mr. Poilievre's motion once these meetings have taken place.”