I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.
I'm not sure that your allowing the point of privilege and motion to be put is conclusive in the present instances. I believe that you were correct to allow the motion to be made and to have it be debated. Having had the debate, I believe you would be entitled to find—and, in fact, are required to find—that if the issue of the redaction of the documents is within the power of the committee, then this can't be heard as a point of privilege.
That's my interpretation of Bosc and Gagnon. It doesn't take much interpreting; that's actually what it says.