I just want to say, from what I understand, Mr. Gerretsen's motion is to be able to explain why the non-partisan public service redacted the documents as opposed to the people who were supposed to, which was the Law Clerk.
This exact same thing happened at Health. Instead of it going straight to the Law Clerk, who is just as non-partisan and is just as efficient and amazing at his job as the non-partisan public service, it would have been perfectly fine for it to have gone to him instead of being done the way it was done.
I don't understand why he now wants to make this about why it was done like that when it should be about who should be doing it. That's what the motion is about: who should have done it. The point of privilege was that the Law Clerk was supposed to do it. He didn't. This is not done just here for the WE documents; it was done at Health as well.
Just the fact that Mr. Gerretsen suggested that Mr. Poilievre brought a fake document to a press release shows you who's doing political theatrics here.