Evidence of meeting #23 for Finance in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was family.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jacques Maziade  Legislative Clerk

2:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

I call the meeting officially to order.

Welcome to meeting number 23 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance. Pursuant to the order of reference of January 27, 2021, the committee is meeting to study Bill C-224, an act to amend an act to authorize the making of certain fiscal payments to provinces, and to authorize the entry into tax collection agreements with provinces. We will be meeting on Bill C-208 in this committee meeting as well. Larry Maguire will present his bill.

Today's meeting is taking place in a hybrid format, which we've all become used to, pursuant to the House order of January 25, 2021. Therefore, members are attending in person in the room and remotely using the Zoom application. The proceedings will be made available via the House of Commons website.

We will not go through the rest of the formalities.

We will start with Mr. Gabriel Ste-Marie's bill, Bill C-224. We will go through clause-by-clause consideration. I hope people have the bill before them. It's not like we're in Parliament, where we can hand around fairly short bills.

Pursuant to Standing Order 75(1), consideration of the preamble will be postponed.

(On clause 1)

I will call for the vote on clause 1, which has four proposed subsections.

I expect you want a recorded division on this, Mr. Ste-Marie.

2:35 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

Unless carried on division, yes, I will call for recorded divisions.

2:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Shall clause 1 carry?

(Clause 1 negatived; nays 5; yeas 2)

(On clause 2)

Shall clause 2 carry? It's one clause relating to the Government of Quebec.

(Clause 2 negatived; nays 5; yeas 2)

(On the preamble)

Shall the preamble carry?

(Preamble negatived; nays 5; yeas 2)

(On the title)

I have to ask you at some point, Mr. Clerk, because I've never had a bill defeated at committee and I'm not certain what we report to the House, but I think we still ought to go through the title.

Shall the title carry?

2:40 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

Mr. Chair, to my knowledge, the title cannot be changed in committee. That is all that is being reported to the House at this time, given the constructive work of the Liberal and Conservative parties.

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Thanks for that advice, Gabriel. That's wise advice.

2:40 p.m.

Jacques Maziade Legislative Clerk

Mr. Chair, the committee can vote on the title.

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Okay. Regardless of whether the title carries or not, how do we handle reporting to the House if it's defeated? Does the chair just report to the House that the bill has been defeated? I've never gone through this process before. Imagine that.

2:40 p.m.

Legislative Clerk

Jacques Maziade

Yes, there will be a report handed to you, and you will table the report saying that all the clauses were defeated.

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

You are saying that we can vote on the title, against or for, contrary to what Mr. Ste-Marie says?

2:40 p.m.

Legislative Clerk

Jacques Maziade

Yes, you can vote on the title.

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Can I ask for a point of information?

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

You can.

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Can you vote in favour of a title if the whole bill is defeated? This might be for the clerk.

2:40 p.m.

Legislative Clerk

Jacques Maziade

Yes, you can.

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Shall the title carry?

2:40 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Chair, on a point of order, I may disagree with how the voting is going, but I think if the Liberals and Conservatives have decided that this bill will not go forward, it would be bizarre to have a truncated portion of the bill go forward. The report will have to go to the House and there will be a debate on the report from this committee, but it seems to me that having a chunk of a bill that has just been gutted go forward doesn't make a lot of sense.

2:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Okay. Thank you for that, Peter.

(Title negatived: nays 5; yeas 3)

Shall the bill carry? We do have to vote on it in total.

2:45 p.m.

Legislative Clerk

Jacques Maziade

As amended, Mr. Chair.

2:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Shall the bill, as amended, carry?

(Bill C-224 as amended negatived: nays 5; yeas 3)

Shall the chair report the bill, as amended, to the House?

On division?

2:45 p.m.

Some hon. members

On division.

2:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

Shall the chair report the bill, as amended, to the House?

2:45 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Chair, on a point of order, I don't believe the bill has been amended. The bill has been killed—

2:45 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

You're right.

2:45 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

—but you are reporting the committee's decision to the House, and there will be a debate on that decision.

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Pat Kelly Conservative Calgary Rocky Ridge, AB

I think that can go on division, that he report it to the House. I don't need a recorded vote on that.