Okay. We will have to move on.
Larry, just before I go to Mr. Falk, this relates to the discussion you just had. We tend to talk about money and the difference in taxation when selling out of the family. But there is another aspect to this in a community, and that is, I guess, coming from the heart: the pride of ownership. We're seeing, especially in the west, I think, more and more absentee landowners, if I can call them that.
With your bill, what could you argue in the case of community? If the bill's intended purpose is met, will it do anything in terms of, number one, instilling pride in your operation that you're fourth-, fifth- or sixth-generation, and holding people in the community? It especially relates to the farm sector. What would you have to say along those lines? What would be the benefits beyond the saved dollars?
Second to that, how much pressure is there—I've seen this—when a son or daughter wants to buy the operation but they don't think they can because they can't give their parents a good enough retirement if they get it at the price they would have to get it at in order to survive? That's another aspect. How much pressure is there on both generations, in terms of the transfer, to not purchase because of the disadvantage of the taxation system?
I have those two questions, and then we'll go to Ted.