Thank you very much.
Mr. Chair, what we have heard here is clear, in my view. You will recall that in the many meetings we had over the course of a number of months on this issue, I did not and my Liberal colleagues did not stand in the way of our discussing the WE Charity issue.
We've had it confirmed now that redactions made on political grounds did not take place. Where those redactions took place, it was entirely consistent with Canadian law—again, things like solicitor-client privilege and things like the protection of personal information.
I would ask my colleagues on the committee whether, if they had family members or friends who were public servants, for example, they would want the personal cellphone numbers or email addresses of those individuals shared. We know the answer, and we have law in place to protect that personal information.
Mr. Poilievre will wave papers, as he did in that infamous press conference, and I underline the word infamous in particular, Mr. Chair. He will wave papers around that look to be redacted to create another story, but there's no story here. I don't see anything nefarious that took place. I'm satisfied that the government acted in an appropriate way.
Thank you very much.