Thanks very much, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. This is very illuminating.
So far we found that the documents were wholly or partially redacted—at least 300 pages—using the broad loopholes of the Access to Information Act. I find that quite disturbing.
I'd like to come back to the other element of your testimony that I find quite disturbing. That is that other redactions, omissions, and exclusions took place on the grounds of cabinet confidence and on the grounds of relevance.
The original motion, as you indicated, also talked about national security. I'm presuming that national security was not cited as a reason for any of the substantial redactions that took place. My question is, how many pages were wholly or partially redacted on the grounds of matters of cabinet confidence, and how many pages were excluded, wholly or partially, on the grounds of relevance?