On the issue of whether it would create a dangerous precedent for the committee or for my office to review cabinet confidences, I would simply point out that committees and the House have been creative in the past, including in the Afghan detainee matter, which dealt with very confidential issues of national security. The Speaker noted that members of Parliament ought to be trusted, that they have democratic legitimacy. If need be, as was the case in that case, there could be some sworn statements of confidentiality and those types of measures. My response to that point is that there may well be ways of achieving the necessary levels of safety, even for something like cabinet confidences.
In terms of your second question...I'm sorry. Can you repeat the second part of your question?